Items in Cart:
Total: $0.00

View Cart | Checkout
     
Home
Equipment
Training
Videos
Photos
Hot Items
Links
About Us
Contact Us

RESCUE NORTHWEST

Course Evaluation

 

Course Title :       Date(s):

 

This questionnaire is the primary tool used by the instructor(s) to gather information to assist in maintaining high quality courses.  Your cooperation in completing this form is appreciated.  Using the following rating scale, please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements.  Space is provided at the end of the questionnaire for your comments and/or suggestions.

 

1. Strongly Disagree

2. Disagree

3. Neither Agree nor Disagree

4. Agree

5. Strongly Agree

[A rating of (5) represents the highest possible score, a rating of (1), the lowest.]

[If you rate an item low, we would appreciate your comments in order that improvement may be made.]

 

1.         

The course material was well organized and presented in a systematic manner.

 

2.         

The course content was relevant and up to date.

 

3.         

The course objectives and expectations for student achievement were clearly stated at the beginning of the course.

 

4.         

 

The course met the stated objectives.

 

5.         

The course provided skills and/or knowledge which will help me in my current or future assignments.

 

6.         

The course was free from outside distractions (e.g., noise, interruptions).

 

7.         

The physical comforts were conducive to learning (e.g., seating arrangements, desk space, classroom ventilation, lighting).

8.         

The course site was convenient (e.g., accessible to lodging, meals, transportation).

 

Instructor 1

9.         

The instructor clearly demonstrated a command of the subject matter.

 

10.      

The instructor lectured at a level the students could understand.

 

11.      

The instructor used a variety of methods of instruction in the course (e.g., lecture, class discussion, media, role play).

 

12.      

The instructor encouraged student(s) questions and generally answered them satisfactorily.

 

Instructor 2

       

9.         

The instructor clearly demonstrated a command of the subject matter.

 

10.      

The instructor lectured at a level the students could understand.

 

11.      

The instructor used a variety of methods of instruction in the course (e.g., lecture, class discussion, media, role play).

 

12.      

The instructor encouraged student(s) questions and generally answered them satisfactorily.

 

Instructor 3

9.         

The instructor clearly demonstrated a command of the subject matter.

 

10.      

The instructor lectured at a level the students could understand.

 

11.      

The instructor used a variety of methods of instruction in the course (e.g., lecture, class discussion, media, role play).

 

12.      

The instructor encouraged student(s) questions and generally answered them satisfactorily.

 

Examination

 

Complete questions 13 & 14 only if an examination was given.

 

13.      

The examination was well prepared and emphasized important course material.

 

14.      

There was consistency between course content and examination questions.

 

Overall Evaluation

 

 

 

15.      

How would you rate this course?  1. Very poor   2. Poor   3. Fair   4. Good   5. Very Good

 

16.      

How would you generally rate the effectiveness of the instructor(s)?   1. Very poor   2. Poor   3. Fair   4. Good   5. Very Good

 

 

 

Please use this space for general comments / suggestions:

 

 

Please identify any instructor(s) and/or block(s) of instruction that may have been deficient and briefly describe the deficiency(ies):

 

 

 

Thank You !